Skip To Main Content

Confidential Informant List Indiana

To be clear, there is no public "Confidential Informant List" in

The Lake County Scandal (2018)

charged with a crime

If a person is and the informant was a material witness to that specific crime, the judge might force the state to reveal the informant’s identity. This is rare. The defense has to prove they can’t get a fair trial without knowing who the informant is. confidential informant list indiana

Secrecy cuts both ways. Indiana has seen scandals where police fabricated informants or kept “off the books” informants not on any official list. In a 2019 FBI-ISP joint investigation, a Clark County deputy was found to be running a side business selling drug protection; his “confidential informants” were actually customers. Because no official list existed, internal affairs struggled to identify his network. The lesson: No list can create accountability risks, but a secret list carries corruption risks. To be clear, there is no public "Confidential

  1. Safety of the informant – Disclosure can mean death. In Indiana, documented cases exist of informants being murdered after their role was exposed.
  2. Ongoing investigations – Revealing one informant can unmask an entire network.
  3. Future recruitment – Potential informants won’t cooperate if they believe names will become public.
  4. Tactical advantage – Drug organizations study public records; a leaked list burns years of police work.

To be clear, there is no public "Confidential Informant List" in

The Lake County Scandal (2018)

charged with a crime

If a person is and the informant was a material witness to that specific crime, the judge might force the state to reveal the informant’s identity. This is rare. The defense has to prove they can’t get a fair trial without knowing who the informant is.

Secrecy cuts both ways. Indiana has seen scandals where police fabricated informants or kept “off the books” informants not on any official list. In a 2019 FBI-ISP joint investigation, a Clark County deputy was found to be running a side business selling drug protection; his “confidential informants” were actually customers. Because no official list existed, internal affairs struggled to identify his network. The lesson: No list can create accountability risks, but a secret list carries corruption risks.

  1. Safety of the informant – Disclosure can mean death. In Indiana, documented cases exist of informants being murdered after their role was exposed.
  2. Ongoing investigations – Revealing one informant can unmask an entire network.
  3. Future recruitment – Potential informants won’t cooperate if they believe names will become public.
  4. Tactical advantage – Drug organizations study public records; a leaked list burns years of police work.