She turned to Jax. “If we don’t activate this, the city will keep losing power. If we do, we’ll erase a lot of… we don’t even know what.”
The defense objected, arguing that the patch was an piece of evidence, violating the Best Evidence Rule and the defendant’s due‑process rights . The prosecution countered that the patch was a legitimate technological correction sanctioned by the store’s vendor and that the resulting video faithfully represented the original scene. shoplyfter hazel moore case no 7906253 s patched
